This trade is unfortunately rife
with businesses (and in particular some of the less
scrupulous operators) that make claims that whilst sounding
impressive, are near to meaningless.
This document aims to enable you to spot the difference between the
near-meaningless claims and the good effective promises used by the trades
more responsible businesses.
The statement we make (click here
for details) is that:
We are BS EN ISO
9001:2000 certified by a UKAS-accredited
independent third party (BSI) for the provision
and sale of fire and safety goods and services including:
-
the sale and servicing of portable fire
extinguishers in accordance with BAFE scheme
SP101 (and hence also with
BS 5306-3:2003 and BS 5306-8:2000);
-
the supply and installation of fire-safety signage;
-
training services; and
-
risk-assessment services.
There are four key general parts to the parts of this statement:
- BS EN ISO
9001:2000. This is
BSI's current
internationally recognised standard for the requirements of a business’s
quality management system
- Independent 3rd party certification. This means
that this is not just a statement to be taken on trust, but that this is
independently certified.
- UKAS-accredited:
This means that the body undertaking the certification has been deemed
competent and accredited to do so by
UKAS, the UK’s
sole national accreditation body recognised by the UK Government
- "For the provision and sale of fire and safety goods and services".
It is clearly essential to ensure that the certification being referred
to covers the areas of business being considered.
All four general parts of this statement are essential if it is to have any
meaning. Additionally, in the case of fire extinguishers, it is essential
to ensure that the certification is also "in accordance with
BAFE scheme
SP101 for the
‘sale and servicing of fire extinguishers’”. In the case of fire
extinguishers, this appropriately relates
it to this trade and further places the requirement for adherence to
BS 5306-3:2003 and
BS 5306-8:2000.
We will now consider a couple of common examples of similar sounding
claims often used by the less scrupulous operators:
- "All work carried out to the British Standard": This is
merely a claim made by the business - There is no independent
verification or certification of this claim.
- "All equipment supplied is Certified to the British Standard":
Even assuming the certification is appropriate, this isn't sufficient -
just because a car garage supplies good brake-pads, it doesn't mean they
supply the correct ones and know how to fit them!
- "We are ISO 9000 approved": ISO 9000 approved for what
exactly? Their "ISO 9000 approval" may cover anything. Also, there is no
statement that the 'approval body' is independent nor indeed
UKAS-accredited, and hence deemed
fit for such a purpose.
Parts of our group have been trading since 1947! That's a genuine
length of experience of over 60 years! This is hard to beat.
However, some of the less scrupulous operators
quote their experience differently: "Well, there's ten of us each with 2½
years 'experience', therefore 10×2½=25 years experience!" Does a
collection of inexperienced employees amount to a good collective
experience? We think not!
Further copy to follow |